Totality of a Religion
“Break down a mosque, break down a temple, and whatever there is besides. But, do not break a human heart, for that is where God himself resides.” – Swami Vivekananda
This is an all time favourite quote of mine. I was again reminded of its depth when recently I was witness to an interesting conversation that transpired between two gentlemen who shared my compartment in the train.
The conversation revolved around the religious faiths the two of them belonged to and the significance of their Gods. Initially, as is always the case with such delicate subjects; what began as a friendly discussion gradually evolved into a heated argument and finally concluded with neither understanding the other’s viewpoint.
Each was trying to make the other feel the omnipotence of the God that symbolised his religion, subtly in the beginning; but when it became obvious that the other was not getting convinced; it became a contest – of superiority and prestige.
This set me thinking. Wasn’t the understanding of the totality of a religion more significant than worshipping a single religious figure?
Can one Krishna or Jesus or Mohammed or Buddha be greater than the collective meaning and essence of the religious institutions they symbolise? Those who go on a rampage trying to propagate the teachings of one master or trying to glorify one figure as God, has really not understood the gist of his/her religion.
If a person can appreciate the universal religion of humanity, he would never confine his/her worship to a single religious figure. I personally feel the collective spirit and philosophy of a religion encompasses individual teachings and it is not a single entity that represents a religion.
And he, who has understood his God, will never try to convince another person to change his religion or convert to another.
Realistically speaking, is it all not man-made; Gods, religions, castes? We, human beings make rules and break them; we build places of worship and ourselves demolish them. What does the power of the unknown (or God) have to do with all this? Ultimately, is God not our ‘conscience’? I am just thinking aloud, that’s all.
This is an all time favourite quote of mine. I was again reminded of its depth when recently I was witness to an interesting conversation that transpired between two gentlemen who shared my compartment in the train.
The conversation revolved around the religious faiths the two of them belonged to and the significance of their Gods. Initially, as is always the case with such delicate subjects; what began as a friendly discussion gradually evolved into a heated argument and finally concluded with neither understanding the other’s viewpoint.
Each was trying to make the other feel the omnipotence of the God that symbolised his religion, subtly in the beginning; but when it became obvious that the other was not getting convinced; it became a contest – of superiority and prestige.
This set me thinking. Wasn’t the understanding of the totality of a religion more significant than worshipping a single religious figure?
Can one Krishna or Jesus or Mohammed or Buddha be greater than the collective meaning and essence of the religious institutions they symbolise? Those who go on a rampage trying to propagate the teachings of one master or trying to glorify one figure as God, has really not understood the gist of his/her religion.
If a person can appreciate the universal religion of humanity, he would never confine his/her worship to a single religious figure. I personally feel the collective spirit and philosophy of a religion encompasses individual teachings and it is not a single entity that represents a religion.
And he, who has understood his God, will never try to convince another person to change his religion or convert to another.
Realistically speaking, is it all not man-made; Gods, religions, castes? We, human beings make rules and break them; we build places of worship and ourselves demolish them. What does the power of the unknown (or God) have to do with all this? Ultimately, is God not our ‘conscience’? I am just thinking aloud, that’s all.